ignorance call miracles are doubtless the results of application of higher laws or forces of nature not yet learned by men, and miracles are to be viewed not as a happenings contrary "to the established constitution and course of things," under a universal reign of law, but as part of the not-yet-understood application of law to things and conditions that seem to produce effects that are in derogation of the ordinary course of the natural--B.H. Roberts
Gillums Science and Faith
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(9)
-
▼
February
(9)
- Chapter 5: What Is Natural?
- Chapter 4: What Is Creation?
- Chapter 3: What Is Faith-Promoting?
- Chapter 2: What Is Science?
- Chapter 1: Are We Afraid To Think
- Two things to remember when considering science
- John A. Widtsoe: "Scientific truth cannot be theol...
- William E. Evenson
- Book: Can Science be Faith-Promoting
-
▼
February
(9)
Monday, February 21, 2011
Chapter 5: What Is Natural?
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Chapter 4: What Is Creation?
And there stood one among them that was like unto God, and he said unto those who were with him: We will go down, for there is space there, and we will take of these materials, and we will make an earth whereon these may dwell… and then the Lard said: Let us go down. And they went down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods, organized and formed the heavens and the earth. And the earth, after it was formed, was empty and desolate, because they had not formed anything but he earth—Abr. 3:24; 4:1-2
The standard Dictionary gives two definitions for the verb “create”
1. To cause to come into existence; especially, to produce out of nothing
2. To produce as a new construction out of existing materials.
The first definition is simply a statement of the medieval error, which still keeps its place in our language. Such a notion has never been any part of Mormonism. The second definition represents the only idea that can be accepted by one who recognizes God as the author of nature.
Our God does not make things come about by a so called “poof”. The creation did not go like this “Thus there was light and POOF there was light on the earth.”
In this chapter Dr. Talmage gives a rather good story
I was privileged recently to talk with a Protestant minister who related an experience of his student days. During one of his vacations, he was traveling in the West and visited with a relative who was doing missionary work among the Indians. The visitor was invited to preach to the supposedly Christianized Indians, and considering them to be simple children of nature, he chose as his text the biblical account of the creation, laying considerable stress on the six days.
After the meeting had closed, he heard one Indian who had come late inquire of one of the tribal chiefs: “who was the pale-face who spoke to us?” And the chief shook his head in rather a puzzled fashion and replied: “He is the man who worships God-in-a-hurry.” At the conclusion of his story, the minister asked us : “can you imagine that Redskin being so stupid as to get no more than that out of my sermon?”
Stupid! I wonder? Neither the simple (but not stupid) Indian with his concept of the agelessness of the works of the Great Spirit nor the scientist who with Huxley can discern “no vestige of a be-in-a-hurry” as a basis for an enduring faith. If creation means organization out of existing materials, then the creative power was manifested, not only in the remote biblical days before the advent of man but throughout all of the past, up to and including and here and now.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Chapter 3: What Is Faith-Promoting?
As a small boy I was the proud possessor of a gift book on the animal kingdom; I was inter-noisy iconoclast-- a disciple of Ingersoll whose name I have forgotten-- gained considerable notoriety and newspaper space by attempting to discredit the Bible by discrediting the story of Jonah and the whale. His principal argument was that the whale is known to have a very narrow throat only a few inches across, and so that it would be physically impossible for a whale to swallow a man. An equally noisy ecclesiastic took issue with him, and in several newspaper columns of perfervid diatribe damned the iconoclast for being a faith-destroyer and maintained that "all things were possible with God," even to the passing of a six foot man through a two inch tube and back; he insisted that a firm belief in the miracles, and particularly this miracle. was essential to a proper appreciation of the Bible and exhorted his readers to "hold to the faith."He wrote in a very convincing style, but his ideas did not seem to make sense. I tok the problem to my father. He said simply: "read your Bible and tell me what you find."So I went back to the original account and read: "Now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah" (Jonah 1:17). But my favorite gift book had informed me that a whale was not a great fish but a warm-blooded mammal. So, it was obvious that the dimensions of a whale's throat had nothing to do with the case!"The night after I read this I had a very vivid dream about a shark" John GillisBrother Talmage gives two tips on faith destroying and faith promoting
- Anything that presents the acceptance of any truth must be classed as faith-destroying
- Anything that contributes to the understanding, or facilitates a keener appreciation, of any truth must be included under the term "faith-promoting"